Friends, greetings.

28 Jul 2023, 18:01

Friends, greetings! 🤝 I explain why it is necessary to vote for my proposal to cancel the addition of the prefix "SB" to the name of tokens when passing through the bridge (option 2): Disadvantages of adding a prefix (option 1): 1. Loss of recognition of the project. 2. Increasing the length of the ticker. 3. Loss of potential investors (who could use the bridge as the cheapest and easiest means on the market to create their own tokens in 4 networks at once)!!! I will explain with an example: Let's say you created your LOVE YOU meme token with the LOVEYOU ticker on the Ethereum network and want to use the ENECUUM network bridge to transfer it to other networks. If you leave the SB prefix, as suggested in the 1 voting option, then you will receive the SBLOVEYOU token in the BSC and POLIGON networks, which is ugly and long (and as a result of the test, we found out that the ticker will not look like "sbLOVEYOU", namely "SBLOVEYOU"). 😱 There will be a problem in the ENECUUUM network at all! Due to the fact that our network supports tickers of only 6 characters, the meme token will turn into SBLOVE (and, for example, MATIC will have the SBMATI ticker, which you agree is unrecognizable at all). Now all wallets already show which network the token belongs to (for example, in MetaMask – with the icon at the top right), so adding a prefix makes no sense at all. By adding a prefix, we lose potential users who are looking for options to create their own token in popular blockchains. ❗️ It's very easy and convenient to do this on the ENECUUM network, and if it's just as easy to transfer it to the BSC network, for example, then this can attract additional customers to us and help increase the cost of ENQ!! ❗️